February 23, 2025 - 13:45
The 'Little Albert experiment' stands as one of the most influential yet controversial psychological assessments of the 20th century. Conducted by John B. Watson and Rosalie Rayner in 1920, this experiment aimed to explore the principles of classical conditioning by exposing a baby, known as Albert, to various stimuli. The infant was subjected to a white rat, loud banging noises, and other frightening stimuli, leading to a conditioned fear response.
The ethical implications of this experiment have been hotly debated over the years. Critics argue that exposing a vulnerable infant to such distressing experiences was not only unethical but also harmful. The long-term effects on Albert's psychological well-being remain largely unknown, as the researchers did not follow up on the child's condition after the experiment concluded.
The tragic end of the experiment raises critical questions about the responsibilities of psychologists and the ethical standards that should govern research involving human subjects, particularly children. This case serves as a stark reminder of the importance of ethical considerations in psychological research and the potential consequences of neglecting them.
